Even before the announcement, there was a very sharp divide on how Paterno should be viewed in all of this. Many felt that the best thing to happen was for Paterno to retire as he said he would. It would look really bad for him and the university if they did nothing and Paterno would be allowed to continue as head coach (in spite of calls for him to retire based on age alone, he is 84). Therefore, with Paterno retiring, the university would save face as it were. Students flocked toward his home to show their support, and he even came out and addressed them during the night. Paternoville was full of tents as usual in advance of this Saturday's home finale and Senior Day. It seemed as if Paterno would be able to go out the way he wanted to, albeit under somewhat dubious circumstances. However, he would later find out that this would not be the case, and the venom coming from the students is nasty (they're trying to make the University of Maryland look good apparently).
![]() |
| Joe Paterno |
***Lest we forget, the Duke lacrosse sex scandal. Now, as far as we know, there are no politicians with axes to grind in State College like there was at Duke with Mike Nifong. As heinous as the allegations are (and they are pretty heinous), Jerry Sandusky is afforded the right of due process in a court of law. He can be smeared in the court of public opinion, and with 40 counts coming from the Grand Jury, there is definitely more than enough evidence to put him away for good, but like those lacrosse players, he will get his day in court***
Back to my original point, we are once again talking about the legacy of a coach and a football program, when we really should be talking about the victims and how their lives have been destroyed because of the whims of a madman. For pretty much the entire time I have run this blog, since January, I have argued that college athletics, although an important part of the higher education system, should not be given a higher level of importance over academics and education. After all, this is (and ought to be) the primary goal of any college institution. Penn State may have been squeaky clean for 46 years under Paterno (we think...). However, as they say, the higher they go, the harder they fall. The Board of Trustees doesn't need to give Joe Paterno or Graham Spanier any due process. They have to act on behalf of the best interests of the Pennsylvania State University. They know that as long as Joe Paterno is the head coach, even if it is only for 4 more games, the only press the University would be getting would be about this scandal and how no action is being taken, just like no action was taken in 2002. Their primary objective has to be to enhance the university as an educational institution. In the best interests of the university, an academic institution, the course of action for them was to make a very tough decision and fire the legendary football coach whose name still graces the university library. I applaud the Board for making a very difficult decision, but I have to say that it is the right one, in addition to canning Spanier.
History will look at Penn State football and Penn State University with pride. 409 wins, 2 national championships, 37 bowl apperances, and 24 bowl wins without the slightest hint of impropriety will earn you several well-deserved plaudits. However, in light of recent events, fairly or unfairly, the pride of Penn State football will always be looked at with an asterisk. What was going on in those locker rooms that we did not know about? How could anybody be informed of any sense of impropriety and not make the responsible decision to inform authorities, no matter how "vague" the information was? I know that it's easy for me to say because I was not there, but Joe Paterno has always had that reputation of putting kids first. The children affected by this scandal had their entire lives in front of them, and they were not put first. They have to be first and foremost on everyone's mind. Just like the Board had to make a tough decision they felt was in the best interest of their university, so did Paterno. Paterno (and Penn State in general) is now suffering the consequences of his decision.
I have to say that I do applaud Paterno for coming forward and saying that even though his legal obligation was fufilled, he wishes he could have done more for the victims affected. I am in no way saying that Paterno should be completely disassociated with Penn State. He should still be held in high regard, as long as he really dedicates himself now for advocating for the victims, and for the victims of any similar crimes.
Jess over at Just Call me Janks (a proud Penn State alum) provides another perspective on this issue. She argues in favor of letting Paterno stay the rest of the season, taking into consideration his entire body of work (referencing the library).

You know what's sad about this Penn St situation is that even if these allegations are verified and the people at fault are convicted, guess what, Penn St won't get any sanctions or bowl bans etc.
ReplyDeleteSo the NCAA's rules are basically saying that paying a kid $100 is a worse punishment than a coach raping young boys.
What happened at Penn State is the true definition of "lack of institutional consent.
Rock on NCAA!!
Oops... That second paragraph should have been ...
ReplyDeleteSo the NCAA's rules are basically saying that paying a kid $100 is a worse infraction than a coach raping young boys.
Got to stop drinking before I post....
@KSo-I don't know if the NCAA will do nothing here. I read on ESPN (Lester Munson) that it's not out of the question that the university could shut the football program down for a couple years, imposing their own "death penalty" to try to eradicate anybody left associated with the Paterno regime. It seems a little far fetched to me, but worth noting. I can't imagine the NCAA will sit on their hands on this one, just can't. Like you were implying, that would be so hypocritical of them not to do anything. They're letting the legal process unfold first
ReplyDelete